Clinic profile · partially verified
Prof. Dr. Kayıhan Şahinoğlu / Get New Hair
Istanbul, Turkey
Last reviewed
Our take
Editorial summary
Get New Hair publishes a one-patient-per-day model and says Prof. Dr. Kayıhan Şahinoğlu performs FUE extraction. A September 2026 patient report describes the same single-patient workflow, with Dr. Şahinoğlu performing extraction and opening recipient channels while technicians completed the final implantation stage. This is strong current process evidence, but it is still one patient account rather than an audit of every procedure. The supporting team's names, qualifications and continuity are not sufficiently public, and no stable current clinic-published price was confirmed. The THI score remains withheld pending calibration of the planned 25-clinic cohort.
At a glance
Structured facts
- Location
- Istanbul, Turkey
- Profile verification
- partially verified
- Commercial relationship
- No commercial relationshipPublisher declaration
Declared by Turkey Hair Index on .
Read the commercial disclosureRecorded separately and never used in score calculation.
- Patient volume
- 1 per day — The clinic publishes a one-patient-per-day model. A September 2026 patient reports being the only transplant patient during a two-day 3,850-graft procedure.Third-party source
Current official wording is corroborated by one recent case. THI has not independently observed the clinic's daily operations across a representative period.
Sources:[1][6]
Procedure roles
Who Actually Performs the Procedure?
- Consultation
- The clinic advertises a first doctor consultation, and a longitudinal patient report describes direct planning with Dr. Şahinoğlu (Prof. Dr. Kayıhan Şahinoğlu)Third-party source
The clinic's consultation wording and one patient journey support doctor involvement; they do not establish an identical pathway for every enquiry.
Sources:[3][7] - Hairline design
- A detailed patient journey assigns planning and hairline work to Dr. Şahinoğlu (Prof. Dr. Kayıhan Şahinoğlu)Third-party source
This is a patient-reported stage allocation and not a clinic-wide audit.
Sources:[7] - Planning
- The clinic offers doctor consultation and patient reports describe direct, conservative planning (Prof. Dr. Kayıhan Şahinoğlu)Third-party source
The evidence supports direct involvement in the reviewed cases, not a universal planning outcome or medical-quality conclusion.
Sources:[3][7] - Incisions / channels
- A September 2026 patient reports that Dr. Şahinoğlu opened the recipient channels (Prof. Dr. Kayıhan Şahinoğlu)Third-party source
Two patient journeys from different procedure periods report the same allocation; current official pages do not name the channel-opening operator as explicitly as they name extraction.
Sources:[6][7] - Extraction
- The clinic promotes extraction by the surgeon, and a September 2026 patient reports that Dr. Şahinoğlu performed extraction (Prof. Dr. Kayıhan Şahinoğlu)Third-party source
The clinic's explicit current statement is corroborated by one recent patient account; this is not an audit of every operation.
Sources:[1][6] - Implantation
- A September 2026 patient and an earlier longitudinal patient journey describe technicians or assistants completing graft placement (Supporting implantation team)Third-party source
Technician participation is consistently patient-reported. The individual team members and any doctor participation during placement are not confirmed.
Sources:[6][7]
Workflow
Daily Patient Volume
- Reported range
- 1 per day — The clinic publishes a one-patient-per-day model. A September 2026 patient reports being the only transplant patient during a two-day 3,850-graft procedure.Third-party source
Current official wording is corroborated by one recent case. THI has not independently observed the clinic's daily operations across a representative period.
Sources:[1][6]
Before treatment
Consultation & Planning
- Doctor consultation
- YesThird-party source
The clinic advertises a first doctor consultation and a patient journey reports direct doctor planning.
Sources:[3][7] - Video consultation
- Not confirmedNot independently confirmed
The online form and photo-upload pathway are public, but a live video consultation was not confirmed as a standard option.
Sources:[3] - Photo assessment
- YesPublicly documented
The online form accepts photographs and treatment goals. The depth and limits of remote assessment should be confirmed directly.
Sources:[3] - Coordinator involvement
- Not confirmedNot independently confirmed
A standardized coordinator role in the current consultation pathway was not established from the reviewed public sources.
Sources:[3] - Notes
- The public consultation form collects contact details, the hair-loss story, restoration goals and uploaded images before a doctor consultation.Publicly documented
This describes the advertised intake route rather than a tested THI enquiry.
Sources:[3]
People
Surgical Team
- Doctors
- Prof. Dr. Kayıhan Şahinoğlu — Clinic-published operating physician; FISHRS Fellow and ABHRS DiplomateThird-party source
The professional organizations support the stated credentials. They do not verify clinic outcomes or every surgical-stage allocation.
Sources:[4][5] - Roles
- Dr. Şahinoğlu performs extraction according to the clinic and a recent patient account, Patient accounts assign recipient-site creation to Dr. Şahinoğlu, Patient accounts assign final implantation to technicians or assistantsThird-party source
The stage division is well supported for the reviewed cases, while the supporting roster remains incomplete.
Sources:[1][6][7] - Team members
- Not confirmedNot independently confirmed
The reviewed public sources identify a supporting technician or assistant role but do not provide a complete current roster, individual qualifications or tenure.
Sources:[2][6] - Team continuity
- The one-patient model and doctor-performed extraction support strong physician continuity in the documented workflow. Supporting-team continuity cannot be tracked because the team members are not named.Third-party source
This separates physician continuity from the still-unconfirmed continuity of the implantation team.
Sources:[1][6]
Assessment
Donor Management
- Published information
The clinic publishes donor-dependent daily extraction ranges and says larger cases may be divided across two consecutive days. This supports a staged planning model, not a clinic-wide donor-safety conclusion.
Third-party sourceThe evidence supports the stated workflow and direct extraction role; it does not establish representative donor outcomes or an individual patient's safe graft limit.
Sources:[1][2][6]Doctor-performed extraction: The clinic advertises extraction by Dr. Şahinoğlu, corroborated by a September 2026 patient report.
Sources:[1][6]Published staged large-case workflow: The clinic says 2,500–3,000 grafts may be harvested in a day and 4,000–5,000-graft cases may extend over two consecutive days depending on donor availability.
Sources:[1]Recent two-day case: A September 2026 patient reports 3,850 grafts over two days. At two weeks, that case is useful for workflow evidence but too early for outcome assessment.
Sources:[6]
Treatment scope
Procedures
Costs
Pricing
We do not currently have pricing information we can publish.
No stable current clinic-published 2026 tariff or package total was confirmed. Historical patient payments and third-party price pages are not presented as the clinic's current price; request a dated itemized quote.
Sources:[3][9]After treatment
Aftercare
- First wash
- Not confirmedNot independently confirmed
A consistent current first-wash arrangement was not established from the reviewed public sources.
Sources:[2][7] - Clinic follow-up
- Not confirmedNot independently confirmed
A standardized current in-clinic follow-up schedule was not established.
Sources:[2][7] - Remote follow-up
- Selected patient discussions describe direct communication with Dr. Şahinoğlu, while also reporting that replies can require repeated follow-up.Third-party source
This is patient-reported access, not a guaranteed response standard or a representative service audit.
Sources:[7] - Medications
- Not confirmedNot independently confirmed
A standard current postoperative medication package was not established from the reviewed public sources.
Sources:[2] - PRP availability
- Not confirmedNot independently confirmed
Current PRP availability or inclusion was not established from the reviewed sources.
- Follow-up duration
- Not confirmedNot independently confirmed
A standardized current long-term follow-up duration was not confirmed.
Sources:[7] - Notes
- Patient-reported physician access is a positive signal, but the public record does not define a complete follow-up timetable, escalation pathway or response-time commitment.Third-party sourceSources:[7]
Editorial assessment
What Stands Out
- The clinic publishes a one-patient-per-day model, corroborated by a September 2026 two-day patient report.
- Doctor-performed extraction is explicit in current clinic material and supported by a recent patient account.
- Current patient evidence distinguishes doctor-performed channel creation from technician-performed implantation.
Editorial assessment
Things to Consider
- Implantation is reported as technician- or assistant-performed; the exact current supporting roster, qualifications and continuity are not sufficiently public.
- No stable current clinic-published tariff or complete package scope was confirmed.
- The September 2026 case is only two weeks postoperative and cannot support a mature outcome conclusion.
- A mature independent journey reports a strong frontal result but lower-than-hoped midscalp or crown density; this remains one patient's experience, not a clinic-wide rate.
- Patient discussions report slow response times; THI did not test a representative response-time sample.
Editorial assessment
May Suit
- People looking for a one-patient model with doctor-performed extraction and patient-reported doctor-created recipient sites.
- People comfortable with a disclosed doctor-and-team division in which technicians complete implantation.
- People willing to obtain a dated written quote and named-team confirmation before booking.
Editorial assessment
May Not Suit
- People who require the named doctor to personally implant every graft.
- People who require a complete public supporting-team roster with individual qualifications and tenure.
- People who need a current public tariff, standardized aftercare timetable or representative clinic-wide outcome dataset before enquiry.
Evidence log
Sources & Verification
Numbered links on structured facts lead to the corresponding entries below. A citation identifies the supporting material; it does not independently verify a claim.
- [1] Get New Hair official websiteClinic website · Publicly documented · Not independently confirmed · checked
Supports the clinic's public identity, Ataşehir location, one-patient-per-day statement, extraction-by-surgeon wording, FUE/FUT scope and donor-dependent multi-day graft ranges. These are clinic-controlled claims.
- [2] Get New Hair surgery workflow pageClinic website · Publicly documented · Not independently confirmed · checked
Supports published donor marking, FUE extraction, a 2,000–3,000 daily follicular-unit range, surgical-team graft preparation and clinic-controlled gallery claims. It does not name every implantation operator.
- [3] Get New Hair online consultation pageClinic website · Publicly documented · Not independently confirmed · checked
Supports the advertised first-doctor consultation form, treatment-goal intake and photograph upload. It does not establish a live-video pathway, response time or current price.
- [4] ISHRS Fellows listPublic record · Third-party source · Verified · checked
Lists Kayihan Sahinoglu, MD, FISHRS among current ISHRS Fellows. Fellowship is professional context and not a clinic-quality or outcome guarantee.
- [5] ABHRS directory — Kayihan Sahinoglu, MDPublic record · Third-party source · Verified · checked
Lists Dr. Şahinoğlu as an ABHRS Diplomate at the Ataşehir address. ABHRS status is not presented as a Turkish dermatology or plastic-surgery residency specialty.
- [6] September 2026 two-week patient update — 3,850 graftsThird-party publication · Third-party source · Not independently confirmed · checked
The patient reports one-at-a-time care, 3,850 grafts over two days, doctor extraction and channel opening, and technician completion of the final stage. At two weeks, it is process evidence and not mature outcome evidence.
- [7] Longitudinal patient report — 3,400 grafts with 2026 updatesThird-party publication · Third-party source · Not independently confirmed · checked
Patient-reported two-day workflow, direct doctor planning/extraction/channel opening, assistant placement, slow communication, and a mature mixed outcome: strong front with lower-than-hoped middle/crown density. One case cannot establish a clinic-wide rate.
- [8] January 2026 patient discussion — 3,660 graftsThird-party publication · Third-party source · Not independently confirmed · checked
Confirms a self-reported recent procedure and early satisfaction but contains insufficient stage detail and is too early for mature outcome assessment.
- [9] Independent 2026 price-verification boundaryThird-party publication · Third-party source · Not independently confirmed · checked
Records that no clinic-specific current price was published and displays only a regional market estimate. THI does not use that market estimate as this clinic's price.
Accuracy
Corrections
Have evidence that a factual detail is inaccurate or out of date?
Read the corrections policy