ASMED Surgical Medical Center — Dr. Koray Erdoğan

Declared by Turkey Hair Index on 2026-10-12.

Recorded separately and never used in score calculation.

ASMED describes several physicians and a team-based workflow, but current typical and maximum patients per day, concurrent cases and active-team count are not established. Large graft sessions or room counts are not daily patient counts.

Manual sequential/DES extraction and K.E.E.P. placement are documented. K.E.E.P. is a placement instrument, not evidence of a universally superior technique; candidacy and available pathways remain case-specific.

The workflow describes a doctor examination; Dr. Erdoğan is associated with the lead pathway. Confirm the physician and allocated consultation time for your booking.

The published process considers facial proportions, donor availability and future loss. This is the stated process, not an audit of each consultation.

The published process includes donor capacity, hair caliber and longer-term needs; supporting technicians perform measurements.

The current published workflow and one patient's earlier premium pathway agree on this stage. A written surgeon-specific allocation is still needed for the booked pathway.

The current official workflow describes manual FUE extraction without clearly assigning its operator. Historical patient evidence reports technician extraction, but that does not establish the current allocation for every pathway.

The workflow separately mentions technician monitoring and a final doctor inspection. It does not identify each current implanting practitioner or their qualifications; team placement is not personal implantation by Dr. Erdoğan.

A doctor inspection and anesthesiology support do not establish Dr. Erdoğan's continuous presence throughout all stages.

ASMED describes several physicians and a team-based workflow, but current typical and maximum patients per day, concurrent cases and active-team count are not established. Large graft sessions or room counts are not daily patient counts.

ASMED publishes an in-person physician consultation and candidacy assessment.

The reviewed current sources did not establish a universal live video consultation with the named physician.

Clinical photography and in-person measurements are documented; a universal remote doctor-led photo-assessment protocol was not established.

An assigned advisor is part of the published patient pathway.

Published planning and individual experiences are distinct; no uniform consultation-duration claim is made.

IAHRS lists current membership and a biography reporting Hacettepe medical graduation in 1994 and previous work in thoracic surgery. Those accounts do not establish a completed Turkish thoracic, dermatology or plastic-surgery specialty. ABHRS certification was not established.

The clinic biography states that Dr. Erdoğan works with six other physicians. This is a clinic claim, not a complete current operator roster.

The reviewed pages identify the lead physician and role categories, but not a complete active physician and technician roster with qualifications, tenure and stage allocation.

ASMED describes full-time staff and planning meetings. This supports its stated institutional model, but does not establish the same named operators across consultation, extraction, implantation and follow-up for each patient.

ASMED publishes a detailed measurement-led planning framework. Its tools and technical literature document a planning approach, not representative donor outcomes or a guarantee against depletion.

• Planning inputs: The published consultation includes donor capacity, density, hair caliber and possible future hair loss.

  Sources:[1]

• Measurement systems: Coverage Value and KE-BOT are documented planning systems; the KE-BOT technical study includes ASMED-affiliated authors and is not an independent clinic-outcome audit.

  Sources:[7][8][6]

• Case-level limits: The reviewed independent material includes satisfaction and donor concerns. These are selected self-reports; THI does not diagnose donor damage remotely or estimate a clinic-wide complication rate.

  Sources:[10][11][13]

Manual sequential/DES extraction and K.E.E.P. placement are documented. K.E.E.P. is a placement instrument, not evidence of a universally superior technique; candidacy and available pathways remain case-specific.

The dedicated cost page publishes €3.50 per transplanted graft, not an all-in invoice. Another official page describes a mandatory additional medical package and optional paid transfers and accommodation; the cost page describes some tests and medication as included. The medical-package amount, final inclusions and rate across all surgeon/team pathways require a current written quote. A graft-count calculation alone is not a confirmed total.

This is the clinic's published immediate-aftercare pathway.

The page does not guarantee a named doctor for every check.

This establishes advertised access, not a response-time guarantee or a standardized photo-follow-up schedule.

Prescriptions are patient-specific. Official pages differ on whether medical-package components are included or additional.

An official page describes optional PRP; current availability and price need confirmation. No clinical benefit is inferred.

A universal minimum long-term follow-up duration was not established in the reviewed pages.